Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness was established to strengthen access to jurisprudence on nationality, statelessness, and related human rights issues. It provides a practical resource for lawyers, academics, advocates, and decision-makers, complementing UNHCR and the Open Society Justice Initiative’s ‘Litigating the Right to Nationality: A Guide for Practitioners’ by bringing together decisions from courts and tribunals across different jurisdictions.
The database covers judgments that address statelessness directly, such as where the applicant is stateless or at risk of statelessness.
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness is an evolving tool and new cases will be added incrementally.
Want to offer feedback or suggest a case for inclusion in the Database? Contact our team
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.
32 cases found
-
Abdu Abucar Hussein and 7 others v. Attorney General
Date of decision: 18 March 2022
Region/country: Africa / Republic of Uganda
On Question 1 The Court found that the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 as amended and the Uganda Citizenship and Immigration Control Act, Cap.66 are clear on who is a citizen and the nature of citizenship. The Court disagreed with the assessment made by the Deputy Passport Control Officer in his circular as the Constitution is very clear as to who a citizen…
-
Abid Khan and others v Government of Bangladesh and others
Date of decision: 05 May 2003
Region/country: Asia / Bangladesh
The Court considered Section 7(1) of the Electoral Rolls Ordinance 1982 and explained that the two vital issues to be decided were the citizenship of the petitioners and the legal implications of their residence at Geneva Camp. Regarding the First Group, the Court found that: The two Petitioners were entitled to citizenship under Article 2 of the President’s Order for the reasons argued by the…
-
Advisory Opinion No. 4 (Nationality Decrees issued in Tunis and Morocco)
Date of decision: 07 February 1923
Region/country: Middle East; North Africa / Tunis (now Tunisia), Morocco
The PCIJ observed that “[t]he question whether a certain matter is or is not solely within the jurisdiction of a State is an essentially relative question; it depends upon the development of international relations.” (p. 24) On this basis, the PCIJ concluded that, although questions of nationality were in principle solely within the jurisdiction of a State, such jurisdiction is limited by rules of international…
-
African Centre of Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS) And People's Legal Aid Centre (PLACE) v Sudan
Date of decision: 04 May 2018
Region/country: Africa / Sudan
The Committee found the Respondent: violated its obligation under Article 3 of the Charter on non-discrimination; violated Article 6(3) and 6(4) of the Charter on the right to nationality and the prevention of statelessness; as a consequence of the above violations, also violated Article 11 of the Charter on the right to education; and did not violate Articles 18(1) and 19(1) of the Charter on…
-
Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs
Date of decision: 08 June 2022
Region/country: Asia / Australia
Is s36B supported by a head of Commonwealth legislative power? The Court rejected Mr Alexander’s argument that s36B is not within the power of the Parliament to make laws with respect to ‘naturalization and aliens’ under s51(xix) of the Constitution. The Court considered that the Constitution left it to Parliament to decide who shall be granted the status of citizenship and what that status may…
-
Attorney General (Appellant) v Shannon Tyrek Rolle and 4 others (Respondents) (The Bahamas)
Date of decision: 04 May 2023
Region/country: Americas / The Bahamas
The Board dismissed the Attorney General’s appeal and held that the Constitution confers citizenship at birth to children born in The Bahamas whose mother is unmarried and not a citizen of The Bahamas and a father who is a citizen. Each of the Attorney General’s three overarching submissions are addressed below. Common law presumption The Board rejected the common law presumption argument advanced by the…
-
Attorney-General v Dow
Date of decision: 03 July 1992
Region/country: Africa / Botswana
On Standing The Court held that the Respondent had standing to bring her application. This was on the basis of her parental relationship with the affected children, and the resulting impact on the respondent of the alleged discrimination. On the Merits The majority of the Court (Schreiner and Puckrin JJA dissenting) held that Section 4 of the Act was unconstitutional. The Court’s reasoning focused on…
-
Case of Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic
Date of decision: 28 August 2014
Region/country: Americas / Dominican Republic
The Court found that the State had violated the presumed victim’s rights under the Convention, and ordered the State to pay reparations and to take administrative and legislative actions to remediate the presumed victim’s situation and to ensure these violations did not re-occur. Obligation to Prevent Statelessness The Court considered that while States have the power to determine nationality, they must exercise it in accordance…
-
Case of the Yean and Bosico Children v. The Dominican Republic
Date of decision: 08 September 2005
Region/country: Americas / Dominican Republic
The Court unanimously rejected the State’s three preliminary objections to the children’s application, and ultimately found that the State had violated several rights under the American Convention. The Court emphasised that nationality is a fundamental human right enshrined in the American Convention and as a political and legal bond that connects a person to a specific State, it allows the individual to acquire and exercise…
-
Centre for Child Law v Director-General Department of Home Affairs and Others
Date of decision: 22 September 2021
Region/country: Africa / South Africa
The majority of the Constitutional Court of South Africa held that Section 10 of the Act is unconstitutional as it is discriminatory against unmarried fathers on the basis of sex, gender and marital status, and is inconsistent with the best interests of children and their rights to dignity, equality, a name and nationality. The Court found that Section 10 of the Act resulted in a…
Page 1 of 4 for 32 cases
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.