Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness was established to strengthen access to jurisprudence on nationality, statelessness, and related human rights issues. It provides a practical resource for lawyers, academics, advocates, and decision-makers, complementing UNHCR and the Open Society Justice Initiative’s ‘Litigating the Right to Nationality: A Guide for Practitioners’ by bringing together decisions from courts and tribunals across different jurisdictions.
The database covers judgments that address statelessness directly, such as where the applicant is stateless or at risk of statelessness.
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness is an evolving tool and new cases will be added incrementally.
Want to offer feedback or suggest a case for inclusion in the Database? Contact our team
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.
18 cases found
-
Andrejeva v. Latvia
Date of decision: 18 February 2009
Region/country: Europe / Latvia
The Court rejected the preliminary objections concerning victim status and jurisdiction, finding that the Government had lodged each inadmissibility complaint out of time according to the Rules of the Court. These objections were also dismissed on substantive grounds, with the Court holding that the Applicant’s situation remained unchanged despite the passing of the 2008 Latvia–Russia agreement, and consequently that her status as a victim under…
-
Anudo Ochieng Anudo v United Republic of Tanzania
Date of decision: 22 March 2018
Region/country: Africa / Tanzania
The Court noted that the application invoked the violation of three fundamental rights (in addition to other incidental rights): (i) the rights under Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to nationality and not to be arbitrarily deprived of nationality; (ii) the right under Article 13 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (‘ICCPR’) not to be arbitrarily expelled; and (iii)…
-
Case of Expelled Dominicans and Haitians v. Dominican Republic
Date of decision: 28 August 2014
Region/country: Americas / Dominican Republic
The Court found that the State had violated the presumed victim’s rights under the Convention, and ordered the State to pay reparations and to take administrative and legislative actions to remediate the presumed victim’s situation and to ensure these violations did not re-occur. Obligation to Prevent Statelessness The Court considered that while States have the power to determine nationality, they must exercise it in accordance…
-
Emin Huseynov v Azerbaijan (No. 2)
Date of decision: 13 July 2023
Region/country: Europe / Azerbaijan
The Court found that there had been an arbitrary revocation of the Applicant’s citizenship, violating Article 8 of the Convention. The Court began their analysis by emphasising that they must follow a ‘consequence-based approach’, looking at what the consequences of the measure were for the Applicant, and whether the measure in question was arbitrary (see Usmanov v Russia). Here, the Court noted that the Applicant…
-
H.P. v Denmark
Date of decision: 19 January 2017
Region/country: Europe / Denmark
Article 8 The Court noted that Article 8 does not guarantee a right to acquire a particular nationality or citizenship, but acknowledged that an arbitrary denial of citizenship could, in certain circumstances, raise an issue under Article 8 due to its impact on private life. ‘Article 8 of the Convention does not guarantee a right to acquire a particular nationality or citizenship. Nevertheless, it cannot…
-
Habbal et al v Argentina
Date of decision: 31 August 2022
Region/country: Americas / Argentina
On Resolution 1088 (expulsion and detention orders) The Court first found that the content of Resolution 1088 and the procedure followed for its adoption ‘constituted a breach of the obligations of the State’ (paragraph 80). The Court found the Respondent (1) unlawfully ordered the expulsion of a citizen (Article 22(5)); (2) failed to follow lawful procedures for expelling lawful permanent residents (Article 22(6)); (3) denied…
-
IHRDA (on behalf of Esmaila Connateh & 13 others) v Angola
Date of decision: 22 May 2008
Region/country: Africa / Republic of Angola
While the Complainant made written submissions on the merits, the Respondent made no submissions despite being given opportunities to do so. In those circumstances, the Commission decided to consider the Complainant’s case. The Commission also considered the ‘exhaustion of local remedies rule’ but noted there were no domestic remedies available to the deportees as the circumstances of their arrest, detention and deportation did not allow…
-
K2 v. United Kingdom
Date of decision: 07 February 2017
Region/country: Europe / United Kingdom
The Court addressed the complaint in two parts, first considering the alleged violation of Article 8 and then the alleged violation of Article 14 read together with Article 8. The Article 8 analysis was also divided into two parts, the first on the deprivation of citizenship and the second on the exclusion from the UK. On Deprivation of Citizenship Following its established methodology, the Court…
-
Kurić and Others v. Slovenia
Date of decision: 26 June 2012
Region/country: Europe / Slovenia
On Preliminary Objections On victim status, the Grand Chamber held that although Slovenia had acknowledged the breach of the Applicants’ rights and issued residence permits to six Applicants, this did not constitute ‘appropriate’ and ‘sufficient’ redress given the ‘widespread human-rights concern created by the ‘erasure’’ and the consequences for these Applicants over a nearly twenty-year period (paragraph 267). The Grand Chamber added that no compensatory…
-
Mazin Adil Ali Deng and Others v. Ministry of Interior and Another
Date of decision: 10 August 2016
Region/country: North Africa / Sudan
The Constitutional Court unanimously ruled in favour of the Applicants (7 judges agreeing). The Court held that Article 7(2) of the 2005 Interim National Constitution clearly states, ‘Every person born to a Sudanese mother or father shall have an inalienable right to enjoy Sudanese nationality.’ The court emphasized that the word ‘or’ provides alternative grounds for nationality. The Court invoked Article 3 of the Constitution…
- 1
- 2
Page 1 of 2 for 18 cases
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.