Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness was established to strengthen access to jurisprudence on nationality, statelessness, and related human rights issues. It provides a practical resource for lawyers, academics, advocates, and decision-makers, complementing UNHCR and the Open Society Justice Initiative’s ‘Litigating the Right to Nationality: A Guide for Practitioners’ by bringing together decisions from courts and tribunals across different jurisdictions.
The database covers judgments that address statelessness directly, such as where the applicant is stateless or at risk of statelessness.
The Global Caselaw Database on Statelessness is an evolving tool and new cases will be added incrementally.
Want to offer feedback or suggest a case for inclusion in the Database? Contact our team
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.
3 cases found
-
H.P. v Denmark
Date of decision: 19 January 2017
Region/country: Europe / Denmark
Article 8 The Court noted that Article 8 does not guarantee a right to acquire a particular nationality or citizenship, but acknowledged that an arbitrary denial of citizenship could, in certain circumstances, raise an issue under Article 8 due to its impact on private life. ‘Article 8 of the Convention does not guarantee a right to acquire a particular nationality or citizenship. Nevertheless, it cannot…
-
Minister of Home Affairs v Ali and Others
Date of decision: 30 November 2018
Region/country: Africa / South Africa
The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court confirmed that persons born in South Africa who meet the criteria in Section 4(3) may apply for citizenship upon attaining the age of majority irrespective of their birth date relative to 1 January 2013, on the following basis: Counsel for the Appellants conceded on appeal that the Respondents satisfied the jurisdictional requirements of Section 4(3). The concession…
-
Q v Denmark
Date of decision: 01 April 2015
Region/country: Europe / Denmark
Admissibility The UN Human Rights Committee (“HRC”) rejected the State Party’s argument that Art 26 did not apply to the author’s claim. The HRC considered that Art 26 applies to the legislation of States and prohibits discrimination in any field regulated and protected by public authorities. Accordingly, the author’s claim under Art 26 was held to be admissible. Article 26 The HRC reaffirmed that Art…
- 1
This initiative has been made possible with the support of UNHCR, the European Network on Statelessness, and Mallesons.